Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor

[Marshall Rose <mrose at dbc.mtview.ca.us>]

> Another option is that the RFC Editor should be more careful. It  
> really isn't that hard for the RFC Editor to run xml2rfc on the XML  
> file and wdiff it against the draft that is approved by the IESG,  
> and bring noticeable differences to the two parties.

agreed. at the risk of stating the obvious: the problem is identical  
to the one where the authors submit nroff source to the rfc-editor.

it's always a good idea to run the toolchain, and then diff the text  
against the I-D approved by the IESG. if there's a difference, the  
relevant ADs and authors need to get on the same page.

/mtr


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf