Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor

[Joe Abley <jabley at ca.afilias.info>]

On 27-Nov-2007, at 12:16, Marshall Rose wrote:

> > > agreed. at the risk of stating the obvious: the problem is identical
> > > to the one where the authors submit nroff source to the rfc-editor.
> > >
> > > it's always a good idea to run the toolchain, and then diff the text
> > > against the I-D approved by the IESG. if there's a difference, the
> > > relevant ADs and authors need to get on the same page.
> >
> > And all of this, incidentally, is what the RFC Editor and ADs do...
>
> ok, so the current process is adequate, we just need to be a little  
> more careful in following it, right?

That's how it looked to me. (I was the author who stupidly attached  
the wrong piece of XML in response to the RFC editor's request for XML  
at the start of AUTH48, for which I partly apologise, and partly take  
a bow for exposing opportunities to improve the workflow :-)


Joe


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf