![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
agreed. at the risk of stating the obvious: the problem is identical to the one where the authors submit nroff source to the rfc-editor.
it's always a good idea to run the toolchain, and then diff the text against the I-D approved by the IESG. if there's a difference, the relevant ADs and authors need to get on the same page.
And all of this, incidentally, is what the RFC Editor and ADs do...
/mtr
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.