Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out



John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com> wrote:

> FWIW, if the enemy is renovations, or even huge and noisy
> construction projects across the street or in adjacent
> buildings, a model of going repeatedly to the same venues and
> building relationships would not help us get more than
> better-quality sympathy.  Hotel behavior is not a coin-toss,
> even with the same hotel.  If there have been no renovation
> projects for several years in a row, that actually increases the
> odds that there will be one next time, rather than assuring that
> there will not be.

The point is that if IETF meetings are potentially repeat business
for a hotel, that gives the hotel an otherwise-absent strong
incentive to do such a good job that we'll want to hold another
IETF meeting there.  From the hotel's perspective, making sure that
we don't get inconvenienced by renovations or other avoidable
disruptions would be one aspect of that.

Greetings,
Norbert.


-- 
Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>                      http://Norbert.ch
President of the Swiss Internet User Group SIUG    http://SIUG.ch

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.