Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
At 3:33 PM +0200 11/29/07, Jari Arkko wrote:
And we
can move a document to historic,
Note that there are two different "no process change needed"
proposals on the table: obsoleting with NULL (or a bit of
explanation) and moving to Historic. Obsoleting a document is much
easier for the outside world to understand than changing its status
to Historic, given that we have many different reasons for Historic.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.