Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?



At 3:33 PM +0200 11/29/07, Jari Arkko wrote:
And we
can move a document to historic,

Note that there are two different "no process change needed" proposals on the table: obsoleting with NULL (or a bit of explanation) and moving to Historic. Obsoleting a document is much easier for the outside world to understand than changing its status to Historic, given that we have many different reasons for Historic.


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.