Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> writes:

    Paul> At 3:33 PM +0200 11/29/07, Jari Arkko wrote:
    >> And we can move a document to historic,

    Paul> Note that there are two different "no process change needed"
    Paul> proposals on the table: obsoleting with NULL (or a bit of
    Paul> explanation) and moving to Historic. Obsoleting a document
    Paul> is much easier for the outside world to understand than
    Paul> changing its status to Historic, given that we have many
    Paul> different reasons for Historic.

I'd assume that you want to do both.  Remember that obseleting a
document does not imply it goes to historic.  I've never fully agreed
with that bit of rfc-editor-process trivia.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf