![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tom Petch wrote: > a 60 day hold seems rather a good idea. Indeed, unless somebody transforms John's proposal "6 weeks" in an ION and/or 2026 update, or whatever red tape cutting this needs. If appeals are drafted by a kind of community this needs time (e.g. to figure out who read the relevant "procdoc" RFCs... ;-) Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.