Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis (Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis (Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile) to Proposed Standard
Sam Hartman identified an issue with one name type (URI) that may
appear in the Subject/Issuer alternative names, when applying the
Name Constrains extension to such names. The issue arises when the
URI does not contain an authority component (a host name in a DNS
name or e-mail address), because the 3280bis description of how to
apply name constraints to URIs assumes the presence of such a
component.
The WG is working on text to address this issue in response to the
last call comment .
Steve
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.