![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 2007-12-02 10:38 Bob Hinden said the following: ... >> Based on the past record, we're talking about something that >> happens 0.58% of the time, or less. >> >> Of course, predicting the future from the past is iffy; there have >> been 10 appeals in 2006 and only one (not document related) in >> 2007, so "it varies". > > Thanks for looking at the data. > > It seems to me that we shouldn't be delaying all new RFCs for a > problem that only occurs .58% of the time. +1 Henrik _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.