Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

[JP Vasseur <jvasseur at cisco.com>]

+1


> From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik at levkowetz.com>
> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:37:05 -0800
> To: <bob.hinden at nokia.com>
> Cc: <iab at ietf.org>, ietf <ietf at ietf.org>, iesg <iesg at ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
> 
> 
> 
> On 2007-12-02 10:38 Bob Hinden said the following:
> ...
>>> Based on the past record, we're talking about something that
>>> happens 0.58% of the time, or less.
>>> 
>>> Of course, predicting the future from the past is iffy; there have
>>> been 10 appeals in 2006 and only one (not document related) in
>>> 2007, so "it varies".
>> 
>> Thanks for looking at the data.
>> 
>> It seems to me that we shouldn't be delaying all new RFCs for a
>> problem that only occurs .58% of the time.
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> Henrik
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf