Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?




On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500,
Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote
a message of 31 lines which said:

Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC.  This remedy
is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it.

Is it to test the future procedure that RFC 4390 is no longer downloadable? :-)

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /rfc/rfc4390.txt on this server.

Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at www.ietf.org Port 80

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.