Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
Subject: Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
From: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:07:44 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20071214133410.GA32264@nic.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1J2yF6-0002vd-UA@megatron.ietf.org> <20071214133410.GA32264@nic.fr>

This URL works for me ...

At 08:34 AM 12/14/2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.