Bill Manning wrote:
> Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > Dave Crocker wrote:
> > >Yaakov Stein wrote:
> > >>Why don't we dedicate a separate 2 hour plenary just to this
> > >>experiment with the moderator announcing workarounds and collected
> > >>statistics ?
> > >The IETF doesn't do those...
> > ...but should. In the VPN Consortium's logo testing, we see much more
> > difficulty with the operations side of IPsec than in the IPsec
> > protocol itself. I would not be surprised to hear similar results for
> > other protocol suites, such as IPv6.
>
> if you think it should, then we should get Dan Lynch back
> and redo the fourth meeting
of the year again... just can
> not call it Interop this go round.
>
> --bill
I love the idea having a 4th meeting as a protocol testing and interoperability event.
We need more protocol implementations and cross testing to get them interoperabel.
BTW: In the evening we can also talk on what IETF could do for world peace.
Cheers,
Mehmet
