Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary

[Ralph Droms <rdroms at cisco.com>]

Fred - to be clear, that DHCPv6 interop testing was not associated in  
any way with the dhc WG.  I'll let the organizers comment on any more  
general sponsorship arrangement or other association of the event with  
the IETF.

- Ralph

On Dec 17, 2007, at Dec 17, 2007,12:23 PM, Fred Baker wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> what leads you to believe that the IETF doesn't do interoperability  
> events? It has done quite a few, notably in DHCPv6 immediately  
> following the recent IETF and going back in various working groups  
> as far as I can remember.
>
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> > YaakFrom ietf-bounces at ietf.org Mon Dec 17 13:47:34 2007
Return-path: <ietf-bounces at ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J4Kz1-0006uX-Cx; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:46:31 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4Kyz-0006rM-F5
	for ietf at ietf.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:46:29 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148])
	by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4Kyz-00038f-3a
	for ietf at ietf.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:46:29 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159])
	by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2007 13:46:28 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13])
	by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBHIkSS0024382; 
	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:46:28 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com
	[64.102.31.102])
	by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id lBHIjfjB005793; 
	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:46:28 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by
	xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:46:25 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([10.86.248.133]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:46:25 -0500
Message-Id: <A1189200-2166-435E-BA0F-D2BA26C40823 at cisco.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms at cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52C8B5F5-DD76-42AB-9FFE-2E4D3B2AB69D at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:46:23 -0500
References: <457D36D9D89B5B47BC06DA869B1C815D05DAD00D at exrad3.ad.rad.co.il>
	<47654A96.6040507 at dcrocker.net>
	<52C8B5F5-DD76-42AB-9FFE-2E4D3B2AB69D at cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2007 18:46:25.0604 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[206D4040:01C840DD]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1510; t=1197917188;
	x=1198781188; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=rdroms at cisco.com;
	z=From:=20Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms at cisco.com>
	|Subject:=20Re=3A=20IPv4=20Outage=20Planned=20for=20IETF=20
	71=20Plenary |Sender:=20
	|To:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred at cisco.com>;
	bh=gVy+4ksZA4arhET7NaaBsLgBXwXuyNo54Su83I7J3Nc=;
	b=mt9Gj3deiYPAyh5Q3LUdWP12tRUgSs0e98zZHBdeYbISMFXf1Gep43mMm4
	F4w7ORN7c1c7bMbbwi9a2oiFTxo8UP+wAYOZKvQnZB4MXa2rZw0PLHvZDY39
	u3gKSNWWat;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=rdroms at cisco.com; dkim=pass (
	sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5
Cc: Crocker Dave <dcrocker at bbiw.net>,
	IETF-Discussion discussion list <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Fred - to be clear, that DHCPv6 interop testing was not associated in  
any way with the dhc WG.  I'll let the organizers comment on any more  
general sponsorship arrangement or other association of the event with  
the IETF.

- Ralph

On Dec 17, 2007, at Dec 17, 2007,12:23 PM, Fred Baker wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> what leads you to believe that the IETF doesn't do interoperability  
> events? It has done quite a few, notably in DHCPv6 immediately  
> following the recent IETF and going back in various working groups  
> as far as I can remember.
>
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> > Yaakov Stein wrote:
> > > Why don't we dedicate a separate 2 hour plenary just to this  
> > > experiment with the moderator announcing workarounds and collected  
> > > statistics ?
> >
> > That's not a plenary.
> >
> > That's an interoperability event.
> >
> > The IETF doesn't do those...
> >
> > d/
> > --
> >
> >  Dave Crocker
> >  Brandenburg InternetWorking
> >  bbiw.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFHZrCebjEdbHIsm0MRAkHvAJ0ewiQIBvnSWP6/azSMbV5dNEdKdQCg41Ni
> jK35XWwmLY7zg8p1qbh/DlM=
> =u3fv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf