Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary



On 17 dec 2007, at 17:07, Dave Crocker wrote:

As a simple model, let's assume 4 administrations are in the critical path:

1. Participant's laptop
2. IETF network ops
3. Collection of backbone operators
4. Participant's service provider

Each of these must support v6, for true dual stack to work.

IPv6 support on the laptop should be doable if the participant cares to enable it for pretty much any OS that shipped in the last 5 years. Obviously the IETF part should be working, and if the participant's service provider has IPv6 connectivity then by definition they are connected to a backbone thov Stein wrote:
Why don't we dedicate a separate 2 hour plenary just to this experiment with the moderator announcing workarounds and collected statistics ?

That's not a plenary.

That's an interoperability event.

The IETF doesn't do those...

d/
--

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFHZrCebjEdbHIsm0MRAkHvAJ0ewiQIBvnSWP6/azSMbV5dNEdKdQCg41Ni
jK35XWwmLY7zg8p1qbh/DlM=
=u3fv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.