Re: TCP

[Marshall Eubanks <tme at multicasttech.com>]

On Dec 17, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Matthew J Zekauskas wrote:

> On 12/17/2007 2:30 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> > It is probably worth looking into the so-called "LAN Speed  
> > Records" and
> > talking with those who have achieved them. An example of a news  
> > report
>
> Internet2 has sponsored some, and as part of the award the  
> contestant is
> required to say exactly how they did it so the experiment can be
> reproduced... the history list with pointers to contestant sites is  
> here:
>
> <http://www.internet2.edu/lsr/history.html>
>
>
> > Operationally, the guys who worry about this sort of thing the  
> > most are probably the astronomers, who routinely move sensor data  
> > from radio-telescopes across the research backbones for data  
> > reduction. In their cases, the sensors routinely generate in  
> > excess of 1
>
> Actually, I believe the physicists actually worry more (or at least as
> much); there's lots of data to be moved around as part of the Large
> Hadron Collider that is starting up at CERN.


Note that for VLBI for sure, and particle particle physics IMO,  
fairly high packet loss rates could easily be
accommodated with no need for retransmission, and so there is no  
reason to use TCP for these applications.

This situation cries out for some sort
of "worst than best effort" scavenger service. If anyone else feels  
the same way, we should try and arrange a Bar BOF in Philadelphia.

Regards
Marshall

> --Matt
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf