Re: Deployment Cases

[Henning Schulzrinne <hgs at cs.columbia.edu>]

Thanks for the list; the cut-off point is probably somewhat  
subjective, but I see at least several protocols on the list that one  
can consider reasonably successful, as in having several well-known  
implementations, shipping as part of common desktop or server  
operating systems, references by other standards-bodies and/or large- 
scale operational deployments:

Enum
XMPP
SCTP
IPSec
MPLS
CalDav
RTP
IMAP4
PPP
LDAP
GEOPRIV (right now, mostly through the LLDP-MED effort, rather than  
directly)
Diameter (3G)
iSCSI
SIEVE

I'm probably missing some due to unfamiliarity. This doesn't seem like  
such a bad batting average.

MSRP isn't really finished yet, so that's probably a bit premature to  
judge.


On Dec 31, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

> IPv6
> DNSSec
> Enum
> XMPP
> CPIM
> BEEP
> MSRP
> SCTP
> IPSec
> SASL
> MPLS
> CalDav
> RTP
> NETCONF
> IMAP4
> PPP
> (a variety of PKI efforts?)
> LDAP
> OPES
> VPIM
> FFPIM
> GEOPRIV
> Diameter
> iSCSI
> DDDS
> SIEVE
>
>
> A number of questions come to mind:
>
> 1.  What additions or removals should be made to the list?
>
> 2.  Has the protocol (or set of protocols that pertain to the  
> acronym) gained widespread adoption and if so, what does  
> "widespread" mean and what does "adoption" mean?  Having 100M+ daily  
> users is definitive, but what about smaller numbers that nonetheless  
> dominate an important niche, such as "LAN-email office workers"?
>
> 3. ...?
>
> d/


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf