RE: LC reviews: draft-brenner-dime-peem

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh at joelhalpern.com] 

> 	The first of the two comments below is probably 
> primarily the IESG's concern, although it affects the IETF last call.
> 	The second comment is a more general issue.
> 
> Comments:
> 	This document requests assignment of a Diameter Command Code.
> 	As this requires "IETF Consensus" additional care may 
> be needed to ensure that the Last Call produces clarity on 
> the required consensus. 
> It would seem appropriate for the last call announcement to 
> have indicated this requirement.  It is difficult to claim 
> "IETF Consensus" 
> from the typical non-response to IETF last call for 
> informational documents.
> 

Hi Joel,

Thank you for catching this. I have required the Secretariat to re-issue
the Last Call with the clarification of the issue you are pointing to. 

Dan

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf