Re: Call for Comment: RFC 4693 experiment

[Spencer Dawkins <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>]

Dear IESG,

The call for comments didn't include a destination for those comments, but 
since people are already responding on-list, I agree with Brian. My only 
suggestion is to use IONs more frequently.

I hope that the upcoming "successful BOF" RFC is also published as an ION, 
for example, because I hope that there will be updates that reflect the 
recently-approved RFC 5111 ("Experiment in Exploratory Group Formation 
within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)").

Thanks,

Spencer


> On 2008-01-17 09:30, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> > The IESG wrote:
> >
> > > Have IONs been valuable?  Should we continue to make use of
> > > this mechanism?
> >
> > Yes and yes.
>
> I'm biased, having helped to start this experiment, but my only
> criticism is that we haven't made enough use of it (i.e. there
> are a number of IETF procedural documents that are ripe for
> republishing as IONs). So, +1 for yes and yes. 



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf