Re: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-00.txt
- To: IETF discussion list <ietf at ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-00.txt
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:50:44 +1300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9WKR9zmZvdn5TfJExk0w7M07iOhm8oq1R2QTCKP98Ho=; b=U0QWwLgjKDMU7GHJV0/VYm5wdwhzM6eYS21V1je9sl9TuDxQIQzwCCR/vZ2RJbDwqcqiC7gENsux+2e3lxrBRFzSvLb/REv+1y/XVNPJdsce2Xsn7oJ/exlBUvQRrY9a9vztfH++ZbKunP68KuEf79HTRTAfwZczb4X71CH1LTw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zz8HTMDHNwlHIWXMRXaTOk/1Qlhx2n1u11lnwajhRtb8WeW3/IYxEHV+GFZOndzKbi0bMPVr8WTc9+j/FbGuyJlTiO7Xr1NDtspx4/UTsL3+IjppAlGoM4gVxTkT+ZfGGBIDUlC4J4uiLxLF8Oe0o3oXjacEbGmP1UcXqFdzMd8=
- In-reply-to: <E1JFds1-0002k9-EE@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
- List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Organization: University of Auckland
- References: <E1JFds1-0002k9-EE@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
> Added sentences to section 8.1 explaining that BCPs and FYIs are sub-
> series of Informational RFCs.
Namely:
> The sub-series of FYIs and
> BCPs are comprised of "Informational documents" in the sense of the
> enumeration above, with special tagging applied.
That's certainly true of the FYI series (which I believe the
RFC Editor regards as dormant today).
It absolutely is not true of the BCP series - they are
single-stage normative documents, and not a subset of
Informational documents. If there's text in RFC 2026 that
implies otherwise, I need to update draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes
again.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
