Re: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-00.txt
At 3:52 AM +0100 1/18/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Or maybe TAO is the IETF "user manual" and public FAQ, while IONs
not limited to Procdoc are the "reference manual" for folks trying
to figure out why "user manual" and "implementation" are different.
Something along that line, yes. The Tao really should be an RFC,
which means that it will go out of date regularly. Its intended
audience is quite different than IETF regulars who would read IONs.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
