![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Bob Braden wrote:
*> *> Section 4.4, second paragraph (s/may/MAY) *> Only a single PARTIAL search return option may be present in a single *> command. *> Should this be: *> Only a single PARTIAL search return option MAY be present in a single *> command. *> *> *> Best regards, *> Chris
"can be"?
That's possible - I think that the authors need to clarify it better. It may be May be or may be can be or doo be shoo whop. :-)
Have a good weekend, Chris
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.