Re: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes-02.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes-02.txt
On Jan 18, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
It could
be better to keep them apart. While you are at it you could adopt
John's proposal to replace "two months" by "six weeks" for appeals.
That would be a real change rather than an alignment with current
practice.
However, it would be a documented change proposal. I find the
euphemism "alignment with current practice" just a touch Orwellian.
- Rob
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.