Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)

To: "Marshall Eubanks" <marshall.eubanks at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
From: Joe Abley <jabley at ca.afilias.info>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:39:47 -0500
Cc: IAOC <iaoc at ietf.org>, Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian at olddog.co.uk>, ietf <ietf at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: ietfarch-ietf-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: ietf at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <dcad22d80802111438n79f1f522q2e910865f2223c0d at mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <875A9D97-BED4-408B-B2B3-806CB4003BB6 at nokia.com> <6CC04E1C-2926-4D57-B24A-000FB4E7398B at muada.com> <BEA23A9F-9305-4605-89D0-102D7E00D7FD at cisco.com> <47AE1F42.3050501 at dcrocker.net> <41D7C1F0-0F44-4F9B-8DB0-966D5F973107 at cisco.com> <98DD0EF2-D00E-43C3-8C79-E3A2A2E1F6D0 at ca.afilias.info> <096a01c86ce2$ad7035c0$0300a8c0 at your029b8cecfe> <20080211193353.99A125081A at romeo.rtfm.com> <47B0B5F1.8090504 at isoc.org> <20080211211145.88C2F5084C at romeo.rtfm.com> <dcad22d80802111438n79f1f522q2e910865f2223c0d at mail.gmail.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On 11-Feb-2008, at 17:38, Marshall Eubanks wrote:

> But then shouldn't the question be whether the style manual should  
> be changed ?

 From "consistent with English grammar" to something else?

Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Marshall Eubanks

References:
- My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines
  - From: Bob Hinden
- Re: My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines
  - From: Fred Baker
- RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Fred Baker
- Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Joe Abley
- Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
  - From: Eric Rescorla

Prev by Date: Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
Next by Date: Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
Previous by thread: RE: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: Myview of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
Next by thread: Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [IAOC] RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of theIAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.