Re: IPv6 NAT?

To: jewheele <jewheele at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 NAT?
From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:25:07 +0100
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>, ietf at ietf.org
Delivered-to: ietfarch-ietf-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: ietf at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <C3D9F0CB.1BF6%jewheele at cisco.com> (jewheele at cisco.com's message of "Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:21:15 -0800")
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C3D9F0CB.1BF6%jewheele at cisco.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

> 2.  that all end nodes will 'automagically' be able to be reached through
> the IPv6 routing and routed protocols.
>
> Obviously #2 is sound

But it's not what will happen on the Internet.  Protocol development
needs to take that into account.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: IPv6 NAT?
  - From: jewheele

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 NAT?
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 NAT?
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 NAT?
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 NAT?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IPv6 NAT?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.