Re: IPv6 NAT?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPv6 NAT?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:08:37AM +0100,
Rémi Després <remi.despres at free.fr> wrote
a message of 68 lines which said:
> The proposal is, more precisely, a new fresh v6 address for each
> OUTGOING connection.
...
> Then, there is no need to concern the DNS with these new
> addresses:
Mark Andrews' concern was, I believe, for the many services which
refuse you or, worse, delay you deliberately, when there is no PTR DNS
record for the source IP address (see
draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
