Re: IPv6 NAT?

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>]

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:42:43PM +0100,
 Rémi Després <remi.despres at free.fr> wrote 
 a message of 49 lines which said:

> A similar result could be achieved if resolvers, when they have to
> get a name for an IPv6 address having a privacy ID, instead of
> having no chance to get any name, would replace this ID by an agreed
> standard value for which there is a PTR RR.

It seems a good idea.

RFC 1101 is probably the right basis for such a feature (which does
not exist today). So, the roadmap is:

* write a RFC 1101bis, mostly to introduce IPv6 support
* convince the resolver's authors to use it (it requires code on their
  side)

 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf