Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?

To: "IETF discussion list" <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?
From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:16:26 -0800
Delivered-to: ietfarch-ietf-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: ietf at core3.amsl.com
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <29113249-689C-47E9-8320-55D59E4ABD5A at insensate.co.uk>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Hi -

> From: "lconroy" <lconroy at insensate.co.uk>
> To: "IETF discussion list" <ietf at ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:23 AM
> Subject: ISO 3166 mandatory?
...
> why am I REQUIRED to enter the ISO-3166 code for my country  
> of residence.
...

Quite right.  It should use UN M.49 codes instead.
;-)

Randy

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- ISO 3166 mandatory?
  - From: lconroy

Prev by Date: Re: amsl.com certificate?
Next by Date: Re: amsl.com certificate?
Previous by thread: Problems during transition (was Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?)
Next by thread: Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.