Problems during transition (was Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Problems during transition (was Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?)



John C Klensin wrote:

>How much more of this will it take before you conclude that we
>have a problem?
>  
>
John,
I haven't been with IETF long enough to witness any earlier secretariat 
transitions (if such thing ever happened before). So it is hard for me 
to compare. But I don't think for an organization of our size with 
different web site access patterns it would have been possible to 
predict all transition problems. I think we should give secretariat some 
time, say till Dublin IETF, to sort things out.

Regards,
Alexey

P.S. I am surely hoping that IETF doesn't have to go through another 
transition in 2 years.


_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.