Re: Transition status (was Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?)

[Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie>]

Bill Fenner wrote:
> On 2/20/08, John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com> wrote:
>>  How much more of this will it take before you conclude that we
>>  have a problem?
> 
> John,
> 
>   Forgive me for saying so, but this sounds like a very extreme
> response to me.  (Unless the expected answer is "A lot")

Bill's right here IMO. Seems like the sky hasn't fallen, at least
when viewed from here in any case:-)

Stephen.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf