Re: Transition status
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Transition status


Tom.Petch wrote:
> I think that there have been rather more problems in areas that are less in the
> public view, supporting the more private parts of the operation.


This community has been moving relentlessly towards a complete loss of any sense 
of propriety.

So I guess it was inevitable that we would have to suffer through references to 
the IETF's private parts.

I cringe at the possible application of that discussion framework to the details 
of IETF anatomy and performance. The latter, in particular, engenders much anxiety.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.