Re: IONs & discuss criteria

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Cullen" == Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com> writes:

    Cullen> Ted,

    Cullen> Speaking for myself here but I suspect that other ADs are in the same
    Cullen> boat ... I'm keen to make sure my Discusses are within the parameters
    Cullen> of the discuss criteria ION regardless of the official status of this
    Cullen> document. Agree we need to sort out what we the end result is of
    Cullen> several experiments. I believe Russ is working to get that some IESG
    Cullen> agenda time.

Ted, as one of the ADs you have most recently interacted with on the
discuss criteria document, I believe that I'm bound by that document
and assume it has the same force as an IESG statement.

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf