Re: IONs & discuss criteria

[Andrew Newton <andy at hxr.us>]

On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>> Sam Hartman wrote:
>>> Making it a BCP will make the interpretation problem worse not  
>>> better.
>>
>>
>> How?
>
> To some extent that depends on how carefully the putative BCP
> is crafted, with "should" and when to disregard "should" being
> very precise.

What does this mean?  Is it an argument that as a BCP the "shoulds"  
carry weight whereas now they can be obeyed more conveniently?  Or is  
it a general comment regarding the futility of formalizing procedures?

-andy
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf