Re: IONs & discuss criteria

[Andrew Newton <andy at hxr.us>]

On Mar 6, 2008, at 9:43 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> It was later that I suggested someone else
> hold the discuss, because I thought Cullen would want to recuse,
> since he is a patent author on a patent his company has filed  
> related to
> this document.

This is a reasonable action given the conflict of interest here.  If  
another IESG member could take up the discuss, the author team and  
document shepherd would work to resolve it.  But Cullen should recuse.

-andy
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf