Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:35:05 +0100
Delivered-to: ietfarch-ietf-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: ietf at core3.amsl.com
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <p06240606c3f5fb872ae5 at [24.4.239.115]><94D79D1D-9087-4776-8117-DC3E5FB2B666 at cisco.com><47D06388.3070008 at qualcomm.com><tslmypbiks0.fsf at mit.edu><47D06E7A.3040904 at qualcomm.com><200803070018.m270GZNt025723 at moria.qualcomm.com><47D09379.9090300 at qualcomm.com><200803071918.m27JIK4Z026872 at cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com><941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF029BF295 at eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se> <0325975F-B4C3-4B2E-87D2-10617E194CB3 at hxr.us>
Reply-to: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz at gmail.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Andrew Newton wrote:

> To Eric, Spencer, and all the other Gen-ART reviewers:  Thank you.

+1  

And thanks for offering a public list allowing to see what is going
on, for a boilerplate stating "treat it just like any other review",
and for picking the nice name "review team" instead of "directorate" <shudder />

 Frank

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

References:
- IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Ted Hardie
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Cullen Jennings
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Thomas Narten
- RE: IONs & discuss criteria
  - From: Eric Gray
- a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
  - From: Andrew Newton

Prev by Date: Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs
Next by Date: Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
Previous by thread: Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
Next by thread: Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.