![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net> writes:
Dave> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Making it a BCP will make the interpretation problem worse not better.
Dave> How?
You can update an IESG statement mor easily than a BCP. As you find
areas where the text is unclear and you have to interpret you can
actually go back and update the text.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.