Re: Request for advancement, draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Request for advancement, draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04
From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:49:42 +0100
Delivered-to: ietfarch-ietf-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: ietf at core3.amsl.com
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <6023E7CD966830055C0305CC at localhost>
Reply-to: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz at gmail.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> I am hereby requesting

Brilliant, another RFC 2026 6.1.1 "recommendation by an 
individual", note it for "PUFI".

> RFC-to-be draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines

That used to be ion-ad-sponsoring, are all IONs back to
I-D now ?

 Frank

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: RE: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
Next by Date: GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71
Previous by thread: Jabber Update
Next by thread: GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Request for advancement, draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.