Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process




Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> You did something very GOOD this time - you invoked the never-before-invoked 
> arbitration process, instead of secretly resolving an "irresistable force 
> meets immovable object" dispute. Please accept credit for this good 
> judgement, especially if you are assigning blame to yourself.


+1

Dispute does not have to mean nastiness; for any interesting human 
collaboration, some dispute is inevitable.

Everything I have heard about how this resolution process went indicates that it 
was handled diligently and constructively.  Independent of one's opinion of 
Scott's decision, it is clear that this matter got serious and deep thought, 
with real concern for longer-term implications.

That's as much as anyone can reasonably ask for.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.