Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>]

Glen,


On 2008-03-19 04:31, Glen Zorn wrote:
...
> Some of us don't subscribe to the IETF list (due to the extremely poor
> S/N ratio).  Someone did forward me Bernard's original message & to me
> it appears to fall squarely into the N category (either that or it is an
> early April 1 RFC candidate).  I understand, though, that it is actually
> receiving serious discussion on the IETF list, so I'm happy that you are
> bringing some of that discussion to this forum.  Of course, common
> courtesy would have required that the WG the work of which is being
> disparaged in outrageous fashion be included in the discussion but
> courtesy seems to be in short supply.

Setting aside the tone of that remark, ietf at ietf.org *is* the recommended
forum for IETF Last Call comments (see the text of every Last Call message).
So I believe that Bernard chose the correct list to launch his opinion.
I can certainly agree that resolving this issue could be better done
on the WG list.

     Brian
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf