Re: Scheduling unpleasantness

To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>
Subject: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
From: Bill Manning <bmanning at ISI.EDU>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:57:55 -0700
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: ietfarch-ietf-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: ietf at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <E4AC61D0-7DD7-4749-8A89-60A85E21075D at muada.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E4AC61D0-7DD7-4749-8A89-60A85E21075D at muada.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i

one has to schedule unpleasentness, since there is so much of it.


-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Scheduling unpleasantness
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum

Prev by Date: RE: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
Next by Date: RE: Scheduling unpleasantness
Previous by thread: Scheduling unpleasantness
Next by thread: RE: Scheduling unpleasantness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Scheduling unpleasantness

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.