![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 23.06.57 Eric Rescorla wrote: > Perhaps that's true, but I don't see that that's an argument > against actually running an open process rather than declaring > a winner in advance and asking the IETF to ratify it.' Hi, There seems to be an underlying argument that we've somehow been doing cloak & dagger backroom cigar-smokin' stuff. That's not true at all, which I hope my previous response adequately demonstrated. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.