Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)

[David Partain <david.partain at ericsson.com>]

Hi all,

On Tuesday 22 April 2008 23.14.03 Andy Bierman wrote:
> IMO, there is strong community consensus for the charter as it
> is currently written.  There are several technical approaches,
> such as 'continue to write data models in XSD' which are
> technically viable, but have no community consensus at all.
>
> I don't think a formal WG process is needed to determine that
> the strongest consensus exists for the approach currently outlined
> in the charter.  The 15 people on the design team represented
> a wide cross section of those actually interested in this work.
> I am among the 10 - 15 people who were not involved in the design team,
> but agree with the charter.  That seems like a lot of consensus
> for this technical approach.

Absolutely.  Well said.

David
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf