Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

From: Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Cc: IAOC <iaoc at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:45:08 -0400
In-reply-to: <483479D1.8090407 at dcrocker.net>

On 5/21/08 3:36 PM, "Dave Crocker" <dhc2 at dcrocker.net> wrote:
> The benefit of the new number requires that folk know about it,

I actually don't think that's the case.  I mean, I think
it should be on the documents (otherwise there's some small
point to having one, but not a lot) but I think it's real
value is to the people who organize information.  The
value to users of information is probably indirect at best -
I'm having a hard time imagining a circumstance in which
having the ISSN on the document is of immediate value to
someone using the document.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Next by Date: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Previous by thread: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Next by thread: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.