Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr at networkresonance.com>
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs at ietf.org>, IAB <iab at ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>, IAOC <iaoc at ietf.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:06:48 +1200
In-reply-to: <20080521230951.EB8C85081A at romeo.rtfm.com>
References: <48349682.6040803 at gmail.com> <C45A11F7.38960%mshore at cisco.com> <20080521230951.EB8C85081A at romeo.rtfm.com>

> 
> I agree with Melinda here. I can't remember ever seeing anything
> like an ISBN or an ISSN used as a citation in an academic paper.

Correct, but I have seen a wide variety of ways to cite RFCs
and tying them all back to an ISSN number would be a step forward
IMHO. In any case: at worst, harmless.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
  - From: Melinda Shore
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
  - From: Eric Rescorla

Prev by Date: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Next by Date: Re: Random Network Endpoint Technology (RNET)
Previous by thread: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Next by thread: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.