Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 01:42:10 +0200
References: <48346149.8040603 at isoc.org> <014301c8bbea$f9243460$0601a8c0 at allison>

Tom Petch wrote:
 
> I note that this will also give us a URN (RFC3044).

What's the point of another URN in addition to urn:ietf:rfc:2648 ?

The ISSN idea is fine if this gets RFCs cataloged in places where
they are not available at the moment.  

For the "info-handles" and DOI ideas I don't understand why the 
IETF would wish to spend money for "yet another number" for RFCs.
See Henning's and Marshall's articles, $1500 per year.  I'm not
at all convinced that this is a good idea.  

 Frank

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
  - From: Tom.Petch

Prev by Date: RE: Random Network Endpoint Technology (RNET)
Next by Date: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Previous by thread: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Next by thread: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.