RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake at motorola.com>
To: <iesg at ietf.org>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:44:06 -0400
In-reply-to: <6B100D42B8C49F65FCBBED8E at klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net>
References: <6B100D42B8C49F65FCBBED8E at klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net>

Standards track RFC 4343 was issued within the past five years (January
2006 to be precise). It contains some example domain names that do not
follow the suggestions in RFC 2606 as well as some that do. As the
author of both RFC 2606 and RFC 4343, I believe the domain names
reserved in RFC 2606 were intended to be encouraged but not mandatory.

Donald
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Next by Date: RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Previous by thread: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Next by thread: RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.