RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

["Debbie Garside" <debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk>]

It is a matter of interpretation.  What does BCP stand for within IETF? ;-)

But seriously, Best Common Practise, IMHO, means, follow this unless you
have a damn good reason not to and if you have that damn good reason then
ask for the BCP to be updated. Just my interpretation.

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kre at munnari.OZ.AU [mailto:kre at munnari.OZ.AU]
> Sent: 17 June 2008 19:50
> To: debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
> Cc: iesg at ietf.org; ietf at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on
> draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
>
>     Date:        Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:50:02 +0100
>     From:        "Debbie Garside" <debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk>
>     Message-ID:  <049b01c8d089$6c901ce0$0a00a8c0 at CPQ86763045110>
>
>   | I would also add that to go against an IETF BCP
>
> Huh?   The BCP in question says (in a bit more eloquent form)
> "Here are some domain names that are reserved from all normal
> use, and so are suitable for use in places where something
> with the syntax of a valid domain names is required, but no
> real domain name should be used - use them where applicable".
>
> It does not say "you must use these domain names" (for any
> purpose at all).
>
> Where's the "go against an IETF BCP" here?
>
> kre
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf