Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07)




On 23 Jun 2008, at 06:19, Dave Cridland wrote:

A final point is that actually phrasing it as "MUST X or Y" is problematic since English lacks the possibility of parenthesis for precendence - hence a stronger binding, such as MUST X unless Y, is preferable.

Preferable to me would be to avoid such ambiguity altogether by breaking things down into simpler atoms ("If Y then MUST X; if !Y then MAY X", or whatever the context supports). More complex constructions seem certain to lead to confusion to native readers of English, never mind those whose more usual tongue is something else.


Joe

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.