Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
To: Aditya JAIN <aditya.jain at st.com>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:58:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <20080624201700.GA19777 at nic.fr>
References: <021c01c8d5e0$a38a9ca0$1edda8c0 at dlh.st.com> <20080624201700.GA19777 at nic.fr>

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:17:00PM +0200,
 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote 
 a message of 17 lines which said:

> It is a shame that the IETF does not have a "SQL extensions" Working
> Group :-)
> 
> But, seriously, you used the wrong list, this is the IETF
> <http://www.ietf.org/> mailing list. IETF develops network protocols
> and does not deal with databases.

As mentioned by several people in private (thanks for the fix), I
forgot about SNMP and the MIBs. Sorry.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table
  - From: Aditya JAIN
- Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer

Prev by Date: Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07)
Next by Date: Re: SHOULD vs MUST
Previous by thread: Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table
Next by thread: Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.