Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends)

[Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti at qualcomm.com>]

On 6/25/2008 4:28 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> --On Thursday, 26 June, 2008 09:41 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
> <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ...
> > And of course, individual ADs
> > have to think carefully whether a given issue is or is not
> > worthy of a DISCUSS, and sometimes they get it wrong. But
> > that will always be true, however we tune the process and
> > procedures.
>
> Brian,
>
> While I agree with this, I also believe that there have to be
> effective safeguards against bad judgments prevailing for too
> long.  And I believe that those have largely slipped away from
> us... unless we believe that making changes, unvalidated by WG
> or mailing list consensus, simply to get a DISCUSS removed is
> the right way to get to "high quality, relevant technical and
> engineering documents...".

Indeed that is the issue!

regards,
Lakshminath

>     john
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF mailing list
> IETF at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf